Governance
Every governance decision here reinforces one message: WEB3MB holds itself to the same standards it asks others to meet.
Governing Philosophy
Every person who serves WEB3MB is entrusted with leaving the institution stronger than they found it. Success is measured not only by growth but by integrity, service, and the trust cultivated over time. Decisions here are made against that standard first.
Decision Making
Methodology Updates
Every change to the Trust Methodology or Trust Standards is dated, versioned, and accompanied by a public change log — visible on those pages once published. A methodology that changes without a visible record isn’t accountable; it’s just different.
Conflict of Interest Policy
Corrections Policy
This is one of the seven commitments in The Promise, and it applies here structurally, not just as a statement: when a finding, a score, or a piece of published research is found to be wrong, the correction will be dated, explained, and left visible alongside the original — not quietly edited away.
Appeals Process
Transparency Commitments
WEB3MB’s core transparency commitments are published in full on The Promise — publishing our methodology, welcoming constructive scrutiny, and earning trust through evidence, among others. Governance exists to make sure those commitments are actually kept.
Annual Institutional Review
WEB3MB will publish an Annual Letter reflecting on the institution’s progress, mistakes, and priorities — modeled on the tradition of an annual shareholder letter, but written for anyone who wants to hold WEB3MB accountable. The first letter will be published once there is a meaningful year of institutional history to reflect on, not before.
Future Advisory Council
“WEB3MB holds itself to the same standards it asks others to meet.”